How to create a complex migration using VersionedSchema
How to create a complex migration using VersionedSchema 관련
Updated for Xcode 15
SwiftData's migrations allow us to update our data models over time, and complex migrations allow us to control how that migration happens by providing custom code.
As an example, if you want to change a model to make a property unique where it previously wasn't, that can be a lightweight migration only if there are no existing duplicate values for that property. However, if there are duplicates you must perform a complex migration by hand, telling SwiftData what the old and new version of the model look like, and providing custom logic to de-dupe your data.
Doing this requires four steps:
- You need to define multiple versions of our data model.
- You wrap each of those versions inside an enum that conforms to the
VersionedSchema
protocol. (It’s an enum only because we won’t actually be instantiating these directly.) - You create another enum that conforms to the
SchemaMigrationPlan
protocol, which is where you'll handle the migrations between each model version. - You then create a custom
ModelContainer
configuration that knows to use the migration plan as needed.
Let's put all this into practice with some sample code. First, we're going to create a simple User
model that tracks a user's name and age, but we'll place it inside a VersionedSchema
enum so that SwiftData is able to track future versions of this model:
enum UsersSchemaV1: VersionedSchema {
static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(1, 0, 0)
static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] {
[User.self]
}
@Model
class User {
var name: String
var age: Int
init(name: String, age: Int) {
self.name = name
self.age = age
}
}
}
Notice how that places the User
class inside the schema, which means it’s neatly namespaced. There are also two important static properties there:
- The exact version of this schema, which for this simple version is 1.0.0. Treating this as semver is a good idea, which means the first number should change when something backward-incompatible is introduced, the second number should change when adding functionality that is backwards compatible, and the third should change when you make bug fixes.
- The array of model types included in this migration, which for us is just a single value:
User.self
.
We’d then make a second versioned schema for v2, with the uniqueness constraint applied:
enum UsersSchemaV2: VersionedSchema {
static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(2, 0, 0)
static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] {
[User.self]
}
@Model
class User {
@Attribute(.unique) var name: String
var age: Int
init(name: String, age: Int) {
self.name = name
self.age = age
}
}
}
That’s basically identical, with the only changes being the 2.0.0 version and @Attribute(.unique)
.
Obviously we don’t want to have to constantly change our code to refer to UsersSchemaV2.User
and so on, so it's a good idea to add a type alias so that User
always points to whatever is your latest version:
typealias User = UsersSchemaV2.User
That completes the first two steps of our process, so the third step is to create a migration plan. This is defined as at least three properties:
- An array of all the versioned schemas you want to use.
- One or more
MigrationStage
instances, defining how to move from one specific version to another. - A
stages
array that lists all the migration stages you have defined.
Once you’ve done that, SwiftData will take care of all possible migrations for you – if your user has v4 installed and needs to migrate straight to v5, or if they have v1 installed and need to migrate through v2, v3, v4, and then onto v5.
In our case, we’d start out with an enum like this:
enum UsersMigrationPlan: SchemaMigrationPlan {
}
We’d add to it an array of the two versioned schema we defined earlier:
static var schemas: [any VersionedSchema.Type] {
[UsersSchemaV1.self, UsersSchemaV2.self]
}
Tips
Place these in their version order, so SwiftData can migrate between versions in order.
Then we’d add one migration stage. This can sometimes be lightweight, but here we're going to use a complex migration – sometimes called a heavyweight, or manual migration.
That means adding a property such as this one to the enum:
static let migrateV1toV2 = MigrationStage.custom(
fromVersion: UsersSchemaV1.self,
toVersion: UsersSchemaV2.self,
willMigrate: { context in
// remove duplicates then save
}, didMigrate: nil
)
We’ll replace that comment in a moment, but first we need to finish the enum by listing all the migration stages we’ve defined. That’s just one here, but in a real app you’re likely to have several, probably mixing lightweight and custom stages as needed.
Add this to the enum now:
static var stages: [MigrationStage] {
[migrateV1toV2]
}
What remains is filling in the // remove duplicates then save
comment with some actual code. In this situation we’ll be given the current model context filled with data, and it’s our job to clean it up somehow before triggering a save manually.
In this instance, our goal is to make sure that the name
property of our users is unique, which means deleting keeping one instance of each name and deleting the rest, like this:
let users = try context.fetch(FetchDescriptor<UsersSchemaV1.User>())
var usedNames = Set<String>()
for user in users {
if usedNames.contains(user.name) {
context.delete(user)
}
usedNames.insert(user.name)
}
try context.save()
Now that we have a migration plan in place, the final step is to create a custom ModelContainer
configuration that knows to use the migration plan as needed.
This means going to your main App
struct and giving it a new property to store a custom-configured model container:
let container: ModelContainer
We need to create this by hand, telling it to load the latest version of our User
model (thanks to our type alias!), and also specifying the migration plan so it knows how to upgrade data. So, we need to give our App
struct an initializer such as this one:
init() {
do {
container = try ModelContainer(
for: User.self,
migrationPlan: UsersMigrationPlan.self
)
} catch {
fatalError("Failed to initialize model container.")
}
}
Last but not least, we need to adjust the modelContainer()
modifier so that we pass in the container
property we just configured rather than asking it to set up all the data from scratch:
.modelContainer(container)
It’s a lot of work, but I hope you can see the importance of getting migration right – we’re being very clear on exactly how SwiftData should move between various versions of our data, thus hopefully ensuring user data never gets lost.