Top 10 Coroutine Mistakes We All Have Made as Android Developers
Top 10 Coroutine Mistakes We All Have Made as Android Developers ę´ë ¨
Introduction
As Android developers, Kotlin coroutines have become an indispensable tool in our asynchronous programming toolkit. They simplify concurrent tasks, make code more readable, and help us avoid the callback hell that was prevalent with earlier approaches. However, coroutines come with their own set of challenges, and itâs easy to fall into common pitfalls that can lead to bugs, crashes, or suboptimal performance.
In this article, weâll explore the top 10 coroutine mistakes that many of us have made (often unknowingly) and provide guidance on how to avoid them. Whether youâre a seasoned developer or just starting with coroutines, this guide aims to enhance your understanding and help you write more robust asynchronous code.
1. Blocking the Main Thread
Running long-running or blocking tasks on the Main
 dispatcher, which can freeze the UI and lead to Application Not Responding (ANR) errors.
Itâs easy to forget which dispatcher is being used, especially in complex codebases. Developers might launch a coroutine without specifying a dispatcher, inadvertently using the Main
 dispatcher by default.
Always specify the appropriate dispatcher for your coroutine:
Example
// Wrong
GlobalScope.launch {
// Long-running task
}
// Correct
GlobalScope.launch(Dispatchers.IO) {
// Long-running task
}
Use Dispatchers.IO
 for I/O operations and Dispatchers.Default
 for CPU-intensive tasks. Reserve Dispatchers.Main
 for updating the UI.
2. Ignoring Coroutine Scope Hierarchy
Not properly structuring coroutine scopes, leading to unmanaged coroutines that outlive their intended lifecycle, causing memory leaks or crashes.
Using GlobalScope
 indiscriminately or failing to cancel coroutines when a component is destroyed.
Use structured concurrency by tying coroutines to a specific lifecycle:
- In activities or fragments, useÂ
lifecycleScope
 orÂviewLifecycleOwner.lifecycleScope
. - In ViewModels, useÂ
viewModelScope
.
Example
// In a ViewModel
viewModelScope.launch {
// Coroutine work
}
This ensures that coroutines are cancelled appropriately when the associated lifecycle is destroyed.
3. Mishandling Exception Propagation
Failing to handle exceptions within coroutines properly, which can cause unexpected crashes or silent failures.
Assuming that try-catch
 blocks will work the same way inside coroutines or not understanding how exceptions propagate in coroutine hierarchies.
- UseÂ
try-catch
 within the coroutine to handle exceptions. Be cautious to check forÂCancellationException
, as itâs used to signal coroutine cancellation, and should typically be rethrown to allow the coroutine to cancel properly. - For structured concurrency, exceptions in child coroutines are propagated to the parent.
Example
viewModelScope.launch {
try {
// Suspended function that might throw an exception
} catch (e: Exception) {
if (e !is CancellationException) {
// Handle exception
} else {
throw e // Rethrow to respect cancellation
}
}
}
Alternatively, use a CoroutineExceptionHandler
 for unhandled exceptions:
val exceptionHandler = CoroutineExceptionHandler { \_, throwable ->
if (throwable !is CancellationException) {
// Handle unhandled exception
}
}
viewModelScope.launch(exceptionHandler) {
// Suspended function that might throw an exception
}
4. Using the Wrong Coroutine Builder
Confusing launch
 and async
 builders, leading to unintended behavior, such as missing results or unnecessary concurrency.
Misunderstanding the difference between launch
 (which returns Job
) and async
 (which returns Deferred
 and is meant for obtaining a result).
- UseÂ
launch
 when you donât need a result and want to fire off a coroutine. - UseÂ
async
 when you need to compute a value asynchronously.
Example
// Using async when you need a result
val deferredResult = async {
computeValue()
}
val result = deferredResult.await()
5. Overusing GlobalScope
Relying on GlobalScope
 for launching coroutines, which can lead to coroutines that run longer than needed and are difficult to manage.
Forgetting to consider the coroutineâs lifecycle or for the sake of simplicity in examples and tutorials.
Avoid GlobalScope
 unless absolutely necessary. Instead, use structured concurrency with appropriate scopes:
lifecycleScope
 for UI-related components.viewModelScope
 for ViewModels.- CustomÂ
CoroutineScope
 with proper cancellation.
6. Not Considering Thread Safety
Accessing or modifying shared mutable data from multiple coroutines without proper synchronization, leading to race conditions.
Assuming that coroutines handle threading for you and neglecting the need for thread safety in shared resources.
- Use thread-safe data structures.
- Synchronize access withÂ
Mutex
 orÂAtomic
 classes. - Confine mutable state to specific threads or coroutines.
Example using Mutex
val mutex = Mutex()
var sharedResource = 0
coroutineScope.launch {
mutex.withLock {
sharedResource++
}
}
7. Forgetting to Cancel Coroutines
Not cancelling coroutines when theyâre no longer needed, which can waste resources or cause unintended side effects.
Overlooking cancellation logic or not handling it properly in custom scopes.
- Use structured concurrency so that coroutines are cancelled automatically.
- When using custom scopes, ensure that you cancel them at the appropriate time.
Example
val job = CoroutineScope(Dispatchers.IO).launch {
// Work
}
// Cancel when done
job.cancel()
8. Blocking Inside Coroutines
Using blocking calls like Thread.sleep()
 or heavy computations inside coroutines without switching to an appropriate dispatcher, which can block the underlying thread.
Misunderstanding that coroutines are lightweight threads and thinking that blocking operations are safe within them.
- Avoid blocking calls inside coroutines.
- Use suspend functions likeÂ
delay()
 instead ofÂThread.sleep()
. - Offload heavy computations toÂ
Dispatchers.Default
.
Example
// Wrong
launch(Dispatchers.IO) {
Thread.sleep(1000)
}
// Correct
launch(Dispatchers.IO) {
delay(1000)
}
9. Misusing withContext
Using withContext
 incorrectly, such as nesting it unnecessarily or misunderstanding its purpose, leading to code thatâs hard to read or inefficient.
Confusion about context switching and the scope of withContext
.
- UseÂ
withContext
 to switch the context for a specific block of code. - Donât nestÂ
withContext
 calls without need. - KeepÂ
withContext
 blocks as small as possible.
Example
// Correct usage
val result = withContext(Dispatchers.IO) {
// Perform I/O operation
}
10. Not Testing Coroutines Properly
Neglecting to write proper tests for coroutine-based code, or writing tests that donât handle coroutines correctly, leading to flaky or unreliable tests.
Testing asynchronous code is more complex, and developers might not be familiar with the testing tools available for coroutines.
- UseÂ
runBlockingTest
 orÂrunTest
 fromÂkotlinx-coroutines-test
 for unit testing coroutines. - LeverageÂ
TestCoroutineDispatcher
 andÂTestCoroutineScope
 to control coroutine execution in tests. - Ensure that you advance time properly when testing code with delays or timeouts.
Example
@Test
fun testCoroutine() = runTest {
val result = mySuspendingFunction()
assertEquals(expectedResult, result)
}
Conclusion
Coroutines are powerful, but with great power comes great responsibility. By being aware of these common mistakes and understanding how to avoid them, you can write more efficient, reliable, and maintainable asynchronous code in your Android applications.
Remember:
- Always choose the correct dispatcher.
- Tie your coroutines to the appropriate lifecycle.
- Handle exceptions thoughtfully.
- Be mindful of coroutine scopes and cancellation.
- Test your coroutine code thoroughly.
By following these best practices, youâll harness the full potential of Kotlin coroutines and provide a smoother, more responsive experience for your app users.
Dobri Kostadinov
Android Consultant | Trainer
Email me | Follow me on LinkedIn (dobrikostadinov
)Â |Â Follow me on Medium (dobri.kostadinov
)Â |Â Buy me a coffee
Info
This article is previously published on proandroiddev