Skip to main content

Important: Do not use an actor for your SwiftUI data models

About 2 minSwiftArticle(s)bloghackingwithswift.comcrashcourseswiftxcodeappstore

Important: Do not use an actor for your SwiftUI data models 관련

Swift Concurrency by Example

Back to Home

Important: Do not use an actor for your SwiftUI data models | Swift Concurrency by Example

Important: Do not use an actor for your SwiftUI data models

Updated for Xcode 15

Swift’s actors allow us to share data in multiple parts of our app without causing problems with concurrency, because they automatically ensure two pieces of code cannot simultaneously access the actor’s protected data.

Actors are an important addition to our toolset, and help us guarantee safe access to data in concurrent environments. However, if you’ve ever wondered “should I use an actor for my SwiftUI data?”, let me answer that as clearly as I can: actors are a really bad choice for any data models you use with SwiftUI – anything that conforms to the ObservableObject protocol.

SwiftUI updates its user interface on the main actor, which means when we make a class conform to ObservableObject we’re agreeing that all our work will happen on the main actor. As an example, any time we modify an @Published property that must happen on the main actor, otherwise we’ll be asking for changes to be made somewhere that isn’t allowed.

Now think about what would happen if you tried to use a custom actor for your data. Not only would any data writes need to happen on that actor rather than the main actor (thus forcing the UI to update away from the main actor), but any data reads would need to happen there too – every time you tried to bind a string to a TextField, for example, you’d be asking Swift to simultaneously use the main actor and your custom actor, which doesn’t make sense.

The correct solution here is to use a class that conforms to ObservableObject, then annotate it with @MainActor to ensure it does any UI work safely. If you still find that you need to be able to carve off some async work safely, you can create a sibling actor – a separate actor that does not use @MainActor, but does not directly update the UI.

Similar solutions…
What is an actor and why does Swift have them? | Swift Concurrency by Example

What is an actor and why does Swift have them?
What is actor hopping and how can it cause problems? | Swift Concurrency by Example

What is actor hopping and how can it cause problems?
How to use @MainActor to run code on the main queue | Swift Concurrency by Example

How to use @MainActor to run code on the main queue
How to create and use an actor in Swift | Swift Concurrency by Example

How to create and use an actor in Swift
How to make parts of an actor nonisolated | Swift Concurrency by Example

How to make parts of an actor nonisolated

이찬희 (MarkiiimarK)
Never Stop Learning.